Tag Archives: shareholder

Partnership And S-Corp Medical Insurance Premiums For Owners: Avoid Double-Dipping

Note: much of the information below was pulled from the old Polito Eppich website — however, they have since merged with another firm to become Magnus Blue, and as such have removed their former blog content. My 2018 blog post linking to their article on how to properly account for partnership and S-Corp health insurance to avoid double-dipping now points to a web archive of the original site — but since that’s hard to find, I’m borrowing some of their material and sharing it here as well. To-date it’s the most well-illustrated and to-the-point summary I’ve seen on the topic.

The IRS rules for reporting health insurance premiums for partnership and S-Corp owners are complex, and as a result, easy to accidentally bungle. Sometimes an entity will incorrectly deduct the premium, and so will the owner — on their personal return — leading to what is known as “double-dipping”. This usually happens when the person preparing the personal return did not also prepare the business entity return.

TL;DR? The most important take-aways are:
1) you can’t double-dip; and,
2) though the particular hoops that have to be jumped through are a) different for partnerships than for S-Corps, and b) a PITA for both, they are in fact the law and must be followed.

The key here is that when the entity pays for health insurance for owners, it is deducted as payments for services to the partners or S-Corp shareholders — who are then entitled to take the self-employed medical insurance deduction — which means it will net to zero deduction on the personal return. If you’re not careful, then the deduction is mistakenly taken on both the entity-level and personal returns. In their original article, Polito Eppich illustrated the accidental double-dipping (all charts are copyright of Polito Eppich).

We will use an example of a $10,000 medical insurance premium to illustrate this issue. Here’s what was happening (incorrect approach):
Income (Expense)Passthrough Business EntityOwner’s K-1Owner’s Personal ReturnNet Taxable Income
Medical premiums paid$(10,000)   
Ordinary income reduced $(10,000) $(10,000)
Self-employed medical insurance deducted  $(10,000)(10,00)
Total effective deduction on owner’s return   $(20,000)
Accidental double-dipping — the $10k premium becomes $20k.
Here is how it should be handled:

PARTNERSHIPS

The actual deduction occurs at the partnership level and is passed to the partner — via lower income on the K-1.

If the partnership pays for the health insurance premiums for its partners, it deducts the expense as guaranteed payments and reports the amount to each partner on their respective K-1s as guaranteed payments.

The partner then picks up the guaranteed payment as income and reports “self-employed health insurance” deduction. The guaranteed payment offsets the self employed health insurance deduction for a net zero effect on taxable income, thus the single deduction described above on the K-1.

(When a partner pays his (her) own medical insurance premiums, the self-employed medical insurance deduction is allowed if there is self-employment income.)

Correct reporting for partnership:
Income (Expense)PartnershipOwner’s K-1Owner’s Personal ReturnNet Taxable Income
Medical insurance premiums paid and deducted$(10,000)$(10,000)$(10,000)$(10,000)
Guaranteed payment to partner 10,00010,00010,000
Self-employed medical insurance deduction (10,000)(10,000)(10,000)
Total effective deduction on owner’s return   $(10,000)
Partnership: by following the IRS rules, the $10k premium remains a $10k net deduction.

S-CORPORATIONS

S-Corps are a bit more complex because owners who work for the company are paid payroll via W-2 (rather than guaranteed payments to partners). Keep in mind that these rules only apply to shareholders who own more than 2% of the company. Owners below 2% are not eligible for the self-employed medical insurance deduction.

The S-corporation deducts the expense as compensation and includes the amount on the shareholder’s W-2 — in Box 1, but not in Boxes 3 or 5, which means they are not subject to Social Security or Medicare taxes (commonly known as “payroll taxes” or “employment taxes”). The amount should also be reported in box 14 of the W-2 — this is only for informational purposes, so that the personal tax preparer knows to take the deduction. Some payroll companies will track this reporting properly throughout the year, but others require a call at year-end to make sure this amount shows up properly in Box 1 and 14. (See my blog post on how to handle this for Gusto Payroll.)

The shareholder reports the compensation from their W-2, then deducts the health insurance amount noted in Box 14 on the W-2 as a “self-employed health insurance” deduction on the personal 1040. Because the amount is subject to income taxes, but not employment taxes, taking the self-employed health insurance deduction leads to a net-zero impact to taxable income. The actual deduction is achieved at the corporation level and passed to the shareholder in the form of lower income reported on the K-1.

Correct reporting by S Corporation for 2% or greater shareholders:
Income (Expense)S-CorpShareholders’s K-1Owner’s Personal ReturnNet Taxable Income
Medical insurance premiums paid and deducted as owner wages lower ordinary income$(10,000)$(10,000)$(10,000)$(10,000)
Owner’s W-2  10,00010,000
Greater than 2% shareholder medical insurance premium (Noted in Box 14 of W-2) (10,000)(10,000)(10,000)
Net taxable income reported by shareholder   $(10,000)
S-Corp: by following the IRS rules, the $10k premium remains a $10k net deduction.

Either way — partnership or S-Corp, the net result is that the amount paid by the company for health insurance on behalf of owners should only be deducted once, on the entity return, and as payments for services. On the personal return these payments will net to zero after the deduction for self-employed health insurance is taken.


If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.

Reasonable Compensation Stress Test & Resources

This isn’t the first time I’ve posted about the useful resources offered by RCReports — but as it turns out, it’s been a while. Apparently I take it for granted that everyone knows about Reasonable Compensation requirements all too often, and then I regularly discover that it’s just not true.

Note: I am a loyal paid subscriber to RCReports, and receive no compensation or discounts for promoting their service or resources. I just think they’re great.

In any case, recently I was asked by a colleague to train her on the basics of Reasonable Compensation and walk through my process. I asked her to do these three pieces of homework first:

  1. Read this article about stress-testing the RC amount – How to Stress Test a Reasonable Compensation Figure – RCReports
  2. Watch this 2-hour RC Reports training session – Reasonable Compensation for S Corps on Vimeo
    (tip for professionals – this class is sometimes offered on CPAacademy for free, with CPE credit included).
  3. Watch this 1-hour RC Reports demo – RCReports Product Demo – RCReports

I know most non-accountants won’t bother with the 2-hour training session that walks through court cases and the history of Reasonable Compensation audits and challenges. And certainly folks who are not in the business of performing these calculations aren’t likely to bother with the 1-hour demo.

But anyone running their own corporation, and those considering electing S-corp status, will want to read about stress-testing. This is something you can do regardless of the calculation process, or how you got to the salary amount in the first place. A helpful excerpt (edited) from the article:

There are six main factors or tests (the IRS lists even more), but “applying just the first three will usually tell you whether a compensation is reasonable or not. In other words – three strikes and you’re out.”

1) Training and experience: Does $X/year seem like enough compensation for somebody who has this level of training and experience?
2) Duties and responsibilities: Does $X/year seem like enough compensation for someone with these duties and responsibilities?
3) Time and effort devoted to the business: Does $X/year seem like enough compensation for someone who worked this many hours/week?

But what if the company can’t afford to pay reasonable compensation? I hear that question a lot, as you might imagine. That’s a common situation, and a simple answer — you’re not required to pay yourself the entire amount of salary… it just means that you can’t issue distributions until it has been paid. “The amount of reasonable compensation will never exceed the amount received by the shareholder either directly or indirectly.” And no fair holding off on paying salary for years while building up retained earnings and then issuing a huge distribution in the first year you pay yourself salary. The IRS knows that trick as well. RCReports writes more about the issue in this article — check out Example 4 in particular for information about the look-back period.

There are different methods of determining Reasonable Compensation — yes, I’m referencing yet additional RCReports articles for details — the cost approach, market approach, and income approach. The Cost Approach generally works best for small businesses where the business owner provides multiple services for the business (wears many hats).

The key with all of these resources is to get shareholder-employees to take a closer look at their own salaries and make sure they are following IRS guidelines. Stress-testing is a great place to start, but for a more thorough approach to calculating Reasonable Compensation, I recommend contacting a CPA with background in this area who can walk you through an RC interview and help you support the amount you ultimately choose.


If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.

K-2 & K-3 Requirement Issues For Small Businesses

2/16/22 UPDATE: Looks like the IRS may be issuing relief after all!

Check out this article — IRS to delay some K-2 and K-3 reporting requirements for partnerships | Accounting Today

The source is #15 in the IRS FAQ on the topic:

This Journal of Accountancy article walks through the particular scenario where this relief — only for tax year 2021 — applies. They note that:

The relief announced Wednesday applies where:

  • In tax year 2021, the direct partners in the domestic partnership are not foreign partnerships, foreign corporations, foreign individuals, foreign estates, or foreign trusts. 
  • In tax year 2021, the domestic partnership or S corporation has no foreign activity, including foreign taxes paid or accrued or ownership of assets that generate, have generated, or may reasonably be expected to generate foreign-source income (see Regs. Sec. 1.861-9(g)(3)).
  • In tax year 2020, the domestic partnership or S corporation did not provide to its partners or shareholders, nor did the partners or shareholders request, the information on the form or its attachments regarding:
    • Line 16, Form 1065, Schedules K and K-1 (line 14 for Form 1120-S), and
    • Line 20c, Form 1065, Schedules K and K-1 (controlled foreign corporations, passive foreign investment companies, 1120-F, Sec. 250, Sec. 864(c)(8), Sec. 721(c) partnerships, and Sec. 7874) (line 17d for Form 1120-S).
  • The domestic partnership or S corporation has no knowledge that the partners or shareholders are requesting such information for tax year 2021.

To learn more, I recommend this excellent Compass Tax Free 10-Minute Webinar update from 2/17/22 on the new FAQ relief for partnerships and S corporations with Thomas Gorczynski, EA USTCP, and Kevin J. Todd, EA, CPA.

(Our original blog post is below, for context and reference.)


K-2 Mountain (courtesy of Wikimedia Commons)

Yes, that photo is of K-2, the second-highest mountain on Earth, where apparently one person dies on the mountain for every four that reach the summit. (Didn’t expect that to show up in my search for a common-usage-right image of an IRS K-2 form.)

The good news is that — as frustrating and arduous as this new IRS K-2 and K-3 reporting requirement is — no one is likely to die while attempting to complete it, and therefore I think we should just all keep this extremely challenging K-2 mountain in mind before we get too frustrated about additional complexities in tax preparation.

In all seriousness, here’s the story:
1) The IRS, in an attempt to deter fraud, for 2021 began requiring all pass-through entities to disclose foreign transactions as part of the tax returns and the K-1 package to shareholders and partners.
2) Initially, the new schedules were only to be used by entities with international transactions to report.
3) In mid-January, the IRS issued revised instructions for the schedules that may require domestic partnerships and S corporations without any foreign source income or assets to prepare Schedules K-2 and K-3.
4) If even one of the partners or shareholders plans to or is required to report foreign tax credits on Form 1116, Foreign Tax Credit, the Partnership or S-Corp must prepare Schedules K-2 and K-3.
5) As a result, the complex and comprehensive “reporting requirement applies to a much larger percentage of pass-through-entity (PTE) returns than perhaps the IRS intended”, as Forbes pointed out.

“This seems like an overly burdensome requirement to quietly clarify in the middle of filing season.” – Tom Gorczynski, EA

All is not lost. Yes, we’re talking about well-over 20 additional pages of tax forms — but it’s likely that you won’t have to fill them all out. An exception from filing Part II and Part III, Section 2, on Schedule K-3 may apply for a pass-through-entity that:

  • only has US-source income;
  • does not have income or deductions that the partners can source or allocate and apportion; and
  • only has limited partners owning less than 10% of the capital and profits of the partnership at all times during the tax year.

(Though the IRS clarified that a business with no foreign-source income must still file Part II (foreign tax credit limitation) and Part III (information for preparing Forms 1116 or 1118) on Schedules K-2 and K-3 if their partners have items of international tax relevance.)

From the NATP Blog: “For preparers who are handling the returns of both the partnership and the partner, the partner can choose alternatives to filing Form 1116 and triggering the Schedules K-2 and K-3 filing requirements if one of the following applies:

  • The partner neither paid nor accrued any foreign taxes and there was no foreign tax credit carryover for the tax year;
  • The foreign tax paid was under the $300 individual reporting threshold ($600 for married filing jointly) for Form 1116, or an election is made under Section 904(j) of the Tax Code to report the credit without the form;
  • Schedule A is used to report a deduction for foreign taxes (which also avoids the $10,000 SALT cap).

“Preparers who are not completing returns for the partner reporting foreign tax payments will need to ask the partners/shareholders directly for their information. If they fail to respond to the request, the preparer will at least have made a documented, good-faith effort to obtain the required information and should be eligible for the good-faith relief outlined in Notice 2021-39.”

To add to the complexity, the availability of e-filing for the new Schedules K-2 and K-3 is:

  • March 20, 2022, for Form 1065
  • Mid-June 2022 for Form 1120-S
  • January 2023 for Form 8865

Therefore, for preparers who have to file Schedules K-2 or K-3, there are three options.
– One is to extend the returns, as e-filing is not available until after the current due date of both the S corporation and partnership returns.
– Another option is to paper-file the return, which will cause delays in processing.
– The third option (what we will likely do for those returns we cannot reasonably extend) is to prepare the K-2/K-3 forms and attach them to e-filed S-Corp and Partnership returns as a PDF. Generally the IRS is not great about referring to these attachments, and some tax software programs have problems delivering them; but at least it will show a good-faith attempt in the case of an audit.

Per Amber Gray-Fenner in Forbes, “These alternatives, while prudent, present some potentially serious unintended consequences:

  • The IRS may be inundated with PDF attachments that it is not prepared to process and review. PDF attachments are often separated from original returns never to be seen again—at least not until the taxpayer receives a notice looking for the “missing” information.
  • Many more PTE returns may be put on extension than would normally be the case.
  • Extended PTE returns mean extended 1040s, which is unsatisfactory to many taxpayers and tax professionals.”

In that same article, my colleague Fred Stein hopes “Occam’s Razor ‘kicks in and IRS realizes the unintended consequences this creates for many small businesses.’ If not, the additional work involved could cause PTE return preparation prices to increase by thirty to fifty percent.”

A summary from last week’s AICPA Town Hall:

We will be reaching out to all our S-Corp and Partnership clients to let them know about these new rules, and to ask that they obtain signed confirmation from each of their owners as to any personal requirement to file Form 1116 or another foreign-related tax form on the 1040 returns.

(For tax preparers who may not have any idea how to fill out these extremely long, complicated, new forms, Greg White is offering a live webinar on February 18th called “A Practical Approach to Quickly Filling Out Forms K-2 and K-3“.)

As you may have guessed, this unexpected new guidance will cause additional time, effort, and cost to all our small business S-Corps and Partnerships — almost none of whom actually have any foreign transaction exposure. After all the requests we’ve made of the IRS to reduce the tax preparation burden on small business owners and their CPAs, I wish I could say this is laughable.


In case that wasn’t enough for you, we’ve compiled a rich list of resources for your reading and watching enjoyment.

AICPA Resources:
Navigating the new Schedules K-2 and K-3 (Sept. 2021 Tax Advisor)
AICPA Comment Letter, K-2/K-3 (Sept. 2021)
AICPA Podcast on Practitioner Insights, K-2/K-3 (Nov. 2021)
IRS offers further K-2/K-3 relief, Journal of Accountancy (Feb. 2022)

NATP Resources:
2/10/22 National Association of Tax Professionals Blog Post – Tax preparers take note: another change for 2021 tax season with Schedules K-2 and K-3

Tax Speaker Resources:
2/4/22 Emergency Update Newsletter
2/9/22 Free 12-Minute Webinar – TaxSpeaker’s Solution to IRS’s New Form K-2 and K-3 for partnerships and S Corporations – YouTube

Compass Tax Resources:
2/10/22 Free 15-Minute Webinar – discussion on the new requirements for partnerships and S corporations with Thomas Gorczynski, EA USTCP, and Kevin J. Todd, EA, CPA
Compass Tax Resources:
2/17/22 Free 10-Minute Webinar – update on the new FAQ relief for partnerships and S corporations with Thomas Gorczynski, EA USTCP, and Kevin J. Todd, EA, CPA

IRS Resources:
Changes to the 2021 Instructions for Schedules K-2 and K-3 (Form
8865)
(Jan 18, 2022, IRS)
Changes to the 2021 S Corporation Instructions for Schedules K-2 and K-3 (Form 1120-S) (Jan 18, 2022, IRS)
Changes to the 2021 Partnership Instructions for Schedules K-2 and K-3 (Form 1065) (Jan 18, 2022, IRS)
Notice 2021-39 re: penalty relief for good faith compliance efforts
(June 2021, IRS)


If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.

IRS Finally Issues Guidance On Employee Retention Credit (ERC)

It finally happened… the IRS released long-awaited guidance on the Employee Retention Credit (ERC):
• August 4 – Notice 2021-49 and accompanying IR-2021-165
• August 10 – Rev. Proc. 2021-33

Some major questions were answered:
• Whether wages of more than 50% shareholders and their spouses are considered qualified wages for the purpose of the credit.
(Mostly “no”, unless you’re an orphan with no living siblings or kids. Much frustration abounds — more on this later.)
• Whether cash tips are included in qualified wages.
(Yes. Good news!)
• Whether full-time employees or full-time equivalent employees should be used to calculate the number of employees to determine whether a business is a small or large eligible employer.
(Head-count, not FTEs. Good news again!)
• Timing of the wage deduction disallowance.
(Must be on 2020 tax return, so amend if already filed.)
• Does gross receipts for ERC include PPP, SVOG, RRF?
(Mostly “no”, as long as you treat them consistently. More good news!)

They also released rules on changes made to the ERC by the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) regarding:
• Recovery Start-up Business
• Severely Financially Distressed Employer

There were other significant updates to the ERC as well, including clarifications as to:
• If an employer may claim both the ERC and the Internal Revenue Code Section 45B “Tip Tax Credit” that applies to food and beverage workers.
(YES! You can double-dip. Truly shocking, and good news.)
• Instructions on amending filed income tax returns returns after receiving the ERC.

Thankfully, the AICPA shared numerous resources on these in this week’s Town Hall — I strongly recommend viewing the AICPA TV session called “Employee Retention Credit: Your Questions Answered”. In this video, Kristin Esposito and April Walker review the IRS notice and explain guidance on the common questions listed above.

Additionally, AICPA released two Tax Adviser Articles:
Guidance on claiming ERC
New safe harbor for ERC gross receipts calculation

They are also putting together a panel of practitioners for a September Town Hall, to discuss how each is dealing with client returns based on this new guidance.

In addition to all the AICPA goodies, our go-to legal resource, Alan Gassman and Brandon Ketron recorded a “PPP and ERC Update” video on August 7th that explores (and vents) Notice 2021-49 (it was recorded prior to Rev. Proc 2021-33, so there’s no reference to the fact that PPP, SVOG, and RRF receipts are not included in gross income for ERC qualification purposes).

Which is a good segue to circle back to the frustration derived from the IRS’s “letter of the law” guidance. The basic idea is that if owners have any living relatives (regardless of association with the business), their wages do not qualify for ERC — but those of an orphan with no siblings or offspring would. Unsurprisingly, this didn’t go over well in the accounting and legal communities:

NCCPAP blasts IRS guidance on Employee Retention Credit | Accounting Today

Newly Issued Employee Retention Credit Guidance Punishes Owner Employees If They Have Living Family Members | Forbes

Practitioners call for fixes to the Employee Retention Credit | Accounting Today

IRS Issues Additional Guidance for Claiming the Employee Retention Tax Credit | Gould & Ratner LLP – JDSupra

I suspect the IRS is attempting to force Congress’s hand by taking the sloppily-written legislation at face value and therefore releasing a ridiculous literal interpretation they know could not have been intended. But without sufficient administrative authority to read their own preferences into it, the IRS has now put Congress in a position to have to release new legislation to explicitly spell out their original intent. Will this happen anytime soon? Do we hold off on filing client 941-X returns in the meantime? Or is Congress too busy to right this wrong?

We’ll be mulling these questions over in the next few weeks, with the intention of making a game-time call with enough time to get our September 15th extended business tax returns filed.


If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.

Client Options for Claiming The Employee Retention Credit (ERC)

Note to readers: the issue outlined below only applies to 50%-or-greater shareholders — which means the business is a corporation — and their spouses who work at the company. It does not apply to sole proprietors or partners — those two groups do not get paid via payroll and therefore are not eligible. Shareholders who own less than 50% are eligible if the business meets the other requirements to claim the credit.

If you are a 50%-or-greater shareholder and your company qualifies for the Employee Retention Credit for either 2020 or 2021, please read on.


I truly cannot believe that it’s June 2021 and I’m writing a blog post to help people choose the least-worst 2020 Employee Retention Credit interpretation — because even though the pandemic is starting to show in our rearview mirrors, we are still living in a universe totally devoid of IRS guidance on the topic of ERC shareholder eligibility. Accountants jokingly refer to this mystery as the Tax Advisers’ “Area 51” on #TaxTwitter.

What am I talking about? And why am I so annoyed? Let me set the scene:

1) Many small business owners are eligible retroactively for the 2020 Employee Retention Credit (ERC), and the IRS decided that the corresponding reduction in wages for that credit needs to be on the 2020 tax return.

2) However, the company’s Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) Forgiveness application needs to be prepared before calculating the amount of the ERC, in order to maximize the amount of financial relief the client receives between the two programs. Therefore, at our firm, these returns are all on extension while we run these calculations.

3) Now that the first round of PPP loans are nearing the end of the payment deferment period — and to be fair, we’re also only a few months away from the tax return extension deadline — we would like to finalize those calculations and returns. (Reminder: there is no “deadline” for applying for PPP Forgiveness — per the SBA, “borrowers can apply for forgiveness any time up to the maturity date of the loan. If borrowers do not apply for forgiveness within 10 months after the last day of the covered period, then PPP loan payments are no longer deferred, and borrowers will begin making loan payments to their PPP lender.”)

4) The catch is — that the IRS has still not released guidance on whether or not 50%+ owners of a corporation are eligible for the credit (or their spouses who work for the business). Accountants are split down the middle on what the existing legislation, which is extremely unclear, tells us on the topic. As such, we either need to take a position or continue to wait for IRS guidance.

What’s that? You’re saying the IRS has still not issued essential guidance on a credit that was created in the first month of the pandemic? Yes. Yes, I am.

Recently, both the AICPA and Tony Nitti, two of my most trusted sources, have weighed in on this with a big “why is the IRS dragging their heels on this” reaction. Nitti went as far as to say, “Are wages paid to greater than 50% owners eligible for the credit? If I had a nickel for every time someone emailed me this question, I could afford to stop shamelessly and relentlessly shilling this newsletter. It is absolutely amazing that a full year after the ERC was created, we still don’t have a definitive answer.”

Okay, enough backstory. As a small business owner, what are your options? I call them Choice 1 (yes) and Choice 2 (no) for short:

  • #1 Calculate ERC as if owners are eligible and file 2020 income tax returns accordingly. This would result in a higher tax for clients (because more wages are disallowed as deductions). Submit PPP Forgiveness applications, but hold off on submitting ERC claims (941-Xs) until guidance is released. If guidance indicates that owners are eligible, file the ERC claims accordingly. If guidance says owners are not eligible, then amend the income tax returns and file the ERC claims accordingly.

This approach may make the most sense when there are two 50%-owners on payroll, and not many other other staff — as the increased credit would be worth the wait, compared to the total credit without owners.

  • #2 Calculate ERC as if owners are not eligible and file 2020 income tax returns accordingly. This would result in a lower tax for clients (because fewer wages are disallowed as deductions). Submit PPP Forgiveness applications, and submit ERC claims (941-Xs) — rather than holding off on these as in the above option. If guidance is eventually released that indicates owners are not eligible, then no action is needed. If guidance indicates that owners are eligible, then decide whether it is worth amending the income tax returns and ERC claims to get the additional funds.

This approach may make the most sense with only one 50%+ owner and many employees, as the cost to amend all returns and claims will probably not be worth the additional credit.

The goal with both approaches is to get PPP Forgiveness applications and tax returns filed as soon as possible, with the best balance between wage deductions and potential wage credits.

While I was tempted to pick one of these two approaches and inform all clients of our choice, I decided — especially with advice from an AICPA Town Hall — that this is a decision that each client needs to make for themselves. We’re happy to explain the potential costs and benefits of each approach and make a personal recommendation for each client’s individual situation, but the decision should be theirs. We recommend other CPA firms take a similar approach.


If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.