If you’re a regular reader, you already know that I’m a huge fan of the National Association of Tax Professionals (NATP), for a bunch of reasons:
Fabulous and affordable education with top-notch instructors
Straightforward “how-to” resources
Practical monthly newsletter with case-studies
On-demand “pay as you go” research service
And a very fun group of folks at the annual conference! (That last one’s a teaser for the final photo in this post.)
I’m especially indebted to NATP because when I first started doing taxes, I wasn’t a CPA yet — and spoiler alert: they don’t really teach you that much about tax preparation when studying for your CPA exams; in fact, three-quarters of the test aren’t related to taxes at all. In those early days, NATP education was the best-quality, most affordable that I could find without being a member of AICPA. (And I tried *all* the groups out, to be clear.)
Anyway, point here is that not only do you not have to be a CPA or EA to take and benefit from their classes — in fact, you don’t even have to be a tax preparer. I am a passionate proponent of teaching bookkeepers what they need to know about taxes to be better at their jobs, coordinate and communicate effectively with their clients’ tax preparers, and level-up by providing value-added advisory services to their clients.
To that end, here’s an upcoming NATP webinar that I suspect will be pretty dang useful for anyone doing client accounting work — bookkeeping, tax, advisory, CAS, and so on. You don’t even have to be a member to attend.
I get a lot of questions and see a great deal of misinformation out there about entity choice… here’s an opportunity to learn more about how to help your clients decide which entity structure is the best choice for them.
(Note: this is *not* a referral link — I’m just really excited about this education getting out there into the world. The presenter, Larry Pon, is a great guy and super-knowledgeable about all the ins-and-outs of this topic.)
From NATP:
Proficient knowledge in selecting the optimal entity structure is vital as it directly shapes a business’s tax outcomes. Strategic choices can enhance deductions, reduce liabilities and ensure regulatory compliance, contributing significantly to a business’s financial well-being and long-term success.
We know you want the best for your clients, so we want to arm you with the knowledge to do so.
As clients start new businesses, one of the major decisions to make is what entity type is best for them? Limited liability companies are by far the most commonly selected type, but did you know, the IRS doesn’t recognize LLCs as an official entity? LLCs can default to a disregarded entity or a partnership depending on the number of members they have, or they can select S or C corporation status.
(Many thanks to the AICPA Town Hall for allowing members to leverage their resources, such as the slides included in this article. The opinions shared here are the author’s and not those of AICPA or CPA.com.)
Tax preparers everywhere spent the past two months gearing up for yesterday’s “opening day” of tax season, January 29th. It was an exciting time for us, as it was finally going to be a return to normal. What does that even mean anymore, you might ask? Well, most of the pandemic financial relief programs have wrapped up (save a straggler ERC claim here or there); amendments resulting from that era have almost all been filed; the odd rebates and credits that no one remembered the amounts for were a thing of the past; there were no last-minute tax extenders; and the season end-date actually lands on April 15th for the first time in ages. It felt like we finally had a handle on things and were back to the “normal” amount of seasonal overwork — rather than a Herculean lift, as was the case for the past four years.
Enter Congress. Despite the fact that The American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), National Association of Tax Professionals (NATP) and small business advocacy groups have been lobbying for over a year to get an extension of certain popular tax benefits that expired in 2023, our leaders somehow managed to wait until after year-end to introduce legislation to that effect — Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act — in a spectacular show of bipartisan ignorance. Never mind that the IRS e-file has been offline since November 18th, because it takes over two months to reprogram the systems for new tax laws, updates, and edits to tax forms.
Some of the anticipated changes if the legislation passes as-written include popular business expensing programs that are designed to be leveraged throughout the year. Making them retroactive does nothing to spur the economy, as the decisions to buy equipment, invest in R&D, or take out loans were already made, last year.
To be clear: I’m not saying these aren’t potentially good changes for tax law, business, and the economy. Just that doing it at this late date is misguided in far too many ways.
And the part I really don’t understand is this: IRS Commissioner Werfel told reporters last Friday, “If there’s a change that impacts your return, we will make the change, and we will send you the update — whether it’s an additional refund or otherwise — without you having to take additional steps.” This is simply impossible for most of the business expensing features of the law, which are voluntary elections on the part of the taxpayer. Presumably this is a reference to the child tax credit provisions in the legislation — which have gotten the most press, but have little effect on small business owners, and are a small portion of the actual bill.
The House Ways and Means Committee released a statement recently indicating that the IRS “confirmed its intention to make necessary systems updates by around six weeks after the date of enactment”. Six weeks. Most refunds are issued within three. Six weeks takes us past the S-Corp and Partnership filing deadline. Six weeks?
Speaking of that deadline, many states announced e-filing would begin on the same date as the IRS opened federal tax season, but it turns out that our state (and I’m guessing others) did not release their S-Corp or Partnership forms with enough advance notice for our third-party tax software to program them into their system, so we are unable to e-file any Illinois business tax returns until February 7th. And we were freaking out about that delay. I can’t imagine what six weeks will look like.
To say nothing of the fact that the next government shutdown deadline is scheduled for one week before business tax returns are due. This should make for an even more laid-back season.
And to add to all of this, that the bill is being funded by an early end to the Employee Retention Credit program, as of January 31, 2024. We spent all of last week scrambling to get the remaining claims in, and won’t know whether that sprint was worth the anxiety or not until this bill passes (or doesn’t) — I feel terrible for those who find out in February that their claim’s due date is suddenly in the past.
Again, some of the provisions in this bill are great ideas — well thought-through, balanced, as well as good for business, families, and potentially the economy. Bad players in the world of ERC mills will finally have to deal with some consequences, and the 1099 burden for small vendors and freelancers will be eased as the threshold is finally indexed for inflation. Some good stuff.
So let’s pass this as 2024 legislation, just in time for the new year, as it should be… and get out of the way of tax season, already!
If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.
As you might imagine, we get quite a few inquiries for tax preparation services, but a) we only do taxes for our small business accounting & bookkeeping clients, and b) we only work with clients in Illinois, Indiana and Wisconsin. I’m currently in the process of interviewing qualified CPAs and bookkeepers to develop a vetted list of firms to whom I can refer potential clients, but in the meantime, I do have a solution for finding a good local tax preparer — the National Association of Tax Professionals’ Find a Tax Preparer (natptax.com) searchable directory.
NATP is one of my favorite professional organizations, and their “Find A Tax Pro” tool works great! When you use the link above, it will automatically filter for folks who are NATP members — which means these people are voluntarily taking the extra step to obtain excellent education in the field on a monthly basis (via e-newsletters, webinars, conferences, their research service, quizzes, and the regular TaxPro magazine), as tax guidance changes so frequently.
(No, I don’t earn commissions for this — I just have great respect for them, have been a member most of my career, have taken countless courses with their instructors, and have been generally impressed with their research service. I also really appreciate what a solid ratio they have of female officers, managers and instructors, which is not always the case in my field. They still need to work on DEI, but let’s be real: so does everyone in accounting and tax, to be honest. It’s an arena rife with underrepresentation issues.)
My suggestion is to use the search box on the right (after you click the button on the bottom of the landing page) and enter the following:
1) What do you need? Tax Preparer
2) Specializing in? All
3) Located in? Type in your city and see if it comes up — if not, pick a slightly larger city nearby, or even your entire state if you prefer.
The thing is, taxes don’t have to be done by a local preparer (so many of us are remote at this point) — however, you do want to work with someone who understands the specific requirements of your geographic area.
So even though it might be a remote relationship, it’s still best to go with someone from your area if you can. They might know something about your industry’s requirements in that area that a non-local would not.
Then lastly, scan or do an on-screen search of whatever list comes up based on your filters, and look for people who have the letters “CPA” or “EA” after their names. These are practitioners who went the extra mile (or twenty) to get a professional designation — it doesn’t mean they know everything, but they’re clearly committed to learning everything they can about tax law, so you want one of them!
And if you find a fabulous CPA in the Chicago area who is still taking on new clients, please let me know in the comments! (Bonus points for women-owned firms; extra bonus points for CPAs that offer tax, accounting, bookkeeping and advisory services.)
If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.
This Journal of Accountancy article walks through the particular scenario where this relief — only for tax year 2021 — applies. They note that:
The relief announced Wednesday applies where:
In tax year 2021, the direct partners in the domestic partnership are not foreign partnerships, foreign corporations, foreign individuals, foreign estates, or foreign trusts.
In tax year 2021, the domestic partnership or S corporation has no foreign activity, including foreign taxes paid or accrued or ownership of assets that generate, have generated, or may reasonably be expected to generate foreign-source income (see Regs. Sec. 1.861-9(g)(3)).
In tax year 2020, the domestic partnership or S corporation did not provide to its partners or shareholders, nor did the partners or shareholders request, the information on the form or its attachments regarding:
Line 16, Form 1065, Schedules K and K-1 (line 14 for Form 1120-S), and
Line 20c, Form 1065, Schedules K and K-1 (controlled foreign corporations, passive foreign investment companies, 1120-F, Sec. 250, Sec. 864(c)(8), Sec. 721(c) partnerships, and Sec. 7874) (line 17d for Form 1120-S).
The domestic partnership or S corporation has no knowledge that the partners or shareholders are requesting such information for tax year 2021.
To learn more, I recommend this excellent Compass Tax Free 10-Minute Webinar update from 2/17/22 on the new FAQ relief for partnerships and S corporations with Thomas Gorczynski, EA USTCP, and Kevin J. Todd, EA, CPA.
(Our original blog post is below, for context and reference.)
K-2 Mountain (courtesy of Wikimedia Commons)
Yes, that photo is of K-2, the second-highest mountain on Earth, where apparently one person dies on the mountain for every four that reach the summit. (Didn’t expect that to show up in my search for a common-usage-right image of an IRS K-2 form.)
The good news is that — as frustrating and arduous as this new IRS K-2 and K-3 reporting requirement is — no one is likely to die while attempting to complete it, and therefore I think we should just all keep this extremely challenging K-2 mountain in mind before we get too frustrated about additional complexities in tax preparation.
In all seriousness, here’s the story: 1) The IRS, in an attempt to deter fraud, for 2021 began requiring all pass-through entities to disclose foreign transactions as part of the tax returns and the K-1 package to shareholders and partners. 2) Initially, the new schedules were only to be used by entities with international transactions to report. 3) In mid-January, the IRS issued revised instructions for the schedules that may require domestic partnerships and S corporations without any foreign source income or assets to prepare Schedules K-2 and K-3. 4) If even one of the partners or shareholders plans to or is required to report foreign tax credits on Form 1116, Foreign Tax Credit, the Partnership or S-Corp must prepare Schedules K-2 and K-3. 5) As a result, the complex and comprehensive “reporting requirement applies to a much larger percentage of pass-through-entity (PTE) returns than perhaps the IRS intended”, as Forbes pointed out.
“This seems like an overly burdensome requirement to quietly clarify in the middle of filing season.” – Tom Gorczynski, EA
All is not lost. Yes, we’re talking about well-over 20 additional pages of tax forms — but it’s likely that you won’t have to fill them all out. An exception from filing Part II and Part III, Section 2, on Schedule K-3 may apply for a pass-through-entity that:
only has US-source income;
does not have income or deductions that the partners can source or allocate and apportion; and
only has limited partners owning less than 10% of the capital and profits of the partnership at all times during the tax year.
(Though the IRS clarified that a business with no foreign-source income must still file Part II (foreign tax credit limitation) and Part III (information for preparing Forms 1116 or 1118) on Schedules K-2 and K-3 if their partners have items of international tax relevance.)
From the NATP Blog: “For preparers who are handling the returns of both the partnership and the partner, the partner can choose alternatives to filing Form 1116 and triggering the Schedules K-2 and K-3 filing requirements if one of the following applies:
The partner neither paid nor accrued any foreign taxes and there was no foreign tax credit carryover for the tax year;
The foreign tax paid was under the $300 individual reporting threshold ($600 for married filing jointly) for Form 1116, or an election is made under Section 904(j) of the Tax Code to report the credit without the form;
Schedule A is used to report a deduction for foreign taxes (which also avoids the $10,000 SALT cap).
“Preparers who are not completing returns for the partner reporting foreign tax payments will need to ask the partners/shareholders directly for their information. If they fail to respond to the request, the preparer will at least have made a documented, good-faith effort to obtain the required information and should be eligible for the good-faith relief outlined in Notice 2021-39.”
Therefore, for preparers who have to file Schedules K-2 or K-3, there are three options. – One is to extend the returns, as e-filing is not available until after the current due date of both the S corporation and partnership returns. – Another option is to paper-file the return, which will cause delays in processing. – The third option (what we will likely do for those returns we cannot reasonably extend) is to prepare the K-2/K-3 forms and attach them to e-filed S-Corp and Partnership returns as a PDF. Generally the IRS is not great about referring to these attachments, and some tax software programs have problems delivering them; but at least it will show a good-faith attempt in the case of an audit.
Per Amber Gray-Fenner in Forbes, “These alternatives, while prudent, present some potentially serious unintended consequences:
The IRS may be inundated with PDF attachments that it is not prepared to process and review. PDF attachments are often separated from original returns never to be seen again—at least not until the taxpayer receives a notice looking for the “missing” information.
Many more PTE returns may be put on extension than would normally be the case.
Extended PTE returns mean extended 1040s, which is unsatisfactory to many taxpayers and tax professionals.”
In that same article, my colleague Fred Stein hopes “Occam’s Razor ‘kicks in and IRS realizes the unintended consequences this creates for many small businesses.’ If not, the additional work involved could cause PTE return preparation prices to increase by thirty to fifty percent.”
A summary from last week’s AICPA Town Hall:
We will be reaching out to all our S-Corp and Partnership clients to let them know about these new rules, and to ask that they obtain signed confirmation from each of their owners as to any personal requirement to file Form 1116 or another foreign-related tax form on the 1040 returns.
As you may have guessed, this unexpected new guidance will cause additional time, effort, and cost to all our small business S-Corps and Partnerships — almost none of whom actually have any foreign transaction exposure. After all the requests we’ve made of the IRS to reduce the tax preparation burden on small business owners and their CPAs, I wish I could say this is laughable.
In case that wasn’t enough for you, we’ve compiled a rich list of resources for your reading and watching enjoyment.
Compass Tax Resources: • 2/10/22 Free 15-Minute Webinar – discussion on the new requirements for partnerships and S corporations with Thomas Gorczynski, EA USTCP, and Kevin J. Todd, EA, CPA Compass Tax Resources: • 2/17/22 Free 10-Minute Webinar – update on the new FAQ relief for partnerships and S corporations with Thomas Gorczynski, EA USTCP, and Kevin J. Todd, EA, CPA
If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.
They were effective in getting a bi-partisan group of nearly 200 members of Congress to send a letter to the US Treasury Secretary requesting the IRS implement the following:
Halt automated collections from now until at least 90 days after April 18, 2022;
Delay the collection process for filers until any active and pending penalty abatement requests have been processed;
Streamline the reasonable cause penalty abatement process for taxpayers impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic without the need for written correspondence;
Provide targeted tax penalty relief for taxpayers who paid at least 70 percent of the tax due for the 2020 and 2021 tax year; and
Expedite processing of amended returns and provide TAS and congressional caseworkers with timely responses.”
The IRS identified the suspended letters and notices as:
CP80, notice of an unfiled tax return. The IRS sends this when it has credited payments or other credits to the taxpayer’s account but has not received a tax return for the tax period.
CP59, unfiled tax return, first notice. The IRS sends this when it has no record of a prior-year return’s having been filed. The Spanish-language version, CP759, is included.
CP516, unfiled tax return, second notice. This is a request for information on a delinquent return for which there is no record of filing. The Spanish-language version, CP616, is included.
CP518, final notice — return delinquency. The Spanish-language version, CP618, is included.
CP501, balance due, first notice. This letter is a reminder of an outstanding balance on the taxpayer’s accounts.
CP503, balance due, second notice.
CP504 balance due, third and final notice. This also is a notice of intent to levy.
2802C, withholding compliance letter. This letter notifies taxpayers whom the IRS has identified as having underwithheld taxes from their wages, with instructions on correcting their withholding amount.
CP259, business return delinquency. The IRS has no record of a prior-year return’s having been filed. The Spanish-language version, CP959, is included.
CP518, final notice of a business return delinquency. The Spanish-language version, CP618, is included.
Per the Journal of Accountancy: “How long the letters and notices will be suspended or at what point the backlog can be considered sufficiently cleared to resume them remains unclear. The news release Feb. 9 said the IRS “will continue to assess the inventory of prior year returns to determine the appropriate time” to start sending them again. And there has been no mention of relieving taxpayers from their obligation to file returns or pay taxes that are the subject of the letters and notices, if those returns and taxes are indeed unfiled and unpaid.”
While this is a welcome step, it falls seriously short of what is needed.
A key takeaway: “What we’re trying to do with these recommendations is to lessen the need to reach out to the IRS. In theory, if we’re having to call the IRS less then the IRS will be able to get to people who have other types of problems and get those problems resolved.”
In testimony before the House Ways and Means Committee on Tuesday, National Taxpayer Advocate Erin Collins noted that as of late December, the IRS had a backlog of 6 million unprocessed individual returns and 2.3 million unprocessed amended individual returns. In addition, more than 2 million Forms 941, Employer’s Quarterly Federal Tax Return, and its amended version remained unprocessed. Many of the latter included claims of the employer retention credit emergency pandemic relief provision.
But all this isn’t enough — they need to hear actual stories from real taxpayers about what you’ve gone through. If you had a challenge with the IRS in the past couple years, and especially if you have an ongoing issue, please contact your Senators and Representatives to tell your personal story. This generally moves them to action, and what we need now is continued and increased pressure on the IRS to make short-term immediate changes that will affect the here-and-now of this tax season.
If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.
I recently wrote about reasons to hold off on Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) forgiveness applications for the time being. Among them is the complex interaction between PPP and the Employee Retention Credit (ERC), which previously was not permitted as an option for financial relief for those that had received PPP funding.
Because ERC is now available for small businesses who have accepted PPP funds — but not for the same payroll dollars (no double-dipping) — there are some pretty complicated calculations that, if done right, could generate a great deal of financial relief to a lot of independent business-owners in need.
The notice explains (1) who are eligible employers; (2) what constitutes full or partial suspension of trade or business operations; (3) what is a significant decline in gross receipts; (4) what is the maximum amount of an eligible employer’s employee retention credit; (5) qualified wages; (6) how an eligible employer claims the employee retention credit; and (7) how an eligible employer substantiates the claim for the credit.
Summary of the 2020 Employee Retention Credit
As a reminder, the 2020 ERC is a payroll tax credit available to business owners whose operations have been fully or partially suspended by government order, or who have seen a drop in income of more than 50% compared to the same quarter in the previous year. (Note: in the new IRS guidance it also states that if “the business’s suppliers are unable to make deliveries of critical goods or materials due to a governmental order”, your business may be eligible for ERC — even though there was no governmental order in your area.)
The credit comprises 50% of up to $10,000 in wages to each employee. The credit cannot be taken on wages that were paid for by PPP funds — but as long as there is no double-dipping, PPP recipients can claim other wages for the purpose of ERC.
Keep in mind that the ERC is complex, and this blog post will not walk you through the specifics — I’ve included a list of some of my favorite resources below. The goal here is to share the steps in our firm’s approach toward these calculations for our clients.
So let’s start with a couple of things to be aware of before we go through the steps that my firm plans to walk through come May/June.
First, the ERC is not generally as valuable as the PPP. It is a payroll tax credit, rather than actual cash funding (though you can file for an advance on it).
And the ERC did not get the benefit of having Congress declare its related expenses deductible, like the special treatment that PPP costs received. So you will lose all the deductions for the payroll tax dollars on which you receive the credit. Deductions aren’t worth as much as credits, so you still come out ahead. But if you’re choosing PPP or ERC for a given payroll dollar, you want to pick the PPP first — up to the minimum 60% requirement for that loan to be forgiven.
However, once you’ve reached that 60% requirement, if you can use non-payroll costs for the remaining 40%, then you “free up” the rest of the payroll dollars to be used for ERC. So you’ll want to work on PPP1 forgiveness applications at the same time as 2020 ERC calculations — they are related to each other, and changing one will potentially affect the other.
But what does this mean for companies filing income tax returns for 2020? Businesses that later decide to retroactively claim the ERC will need to file amended income tax returns — or preferably, put their income tax returns on extension until they have claimed the ERC for 2020. We had previously thought that cash-basis filers could potentially claim the income for the credit and the associated reduction in payroll costs on the 2021 income tax return, but that was ruled out with the most recent IRS guidance.
Steps to Evaluate Payroll for PPP vs ERC
The hope is that in most cases you’ll be able to do Steps One and Two and skip the rest. But just in case, Steps Three and Four will take you the rest of the way there.
Step One When figuring out how to combine ERC and PPP, literally make a calendar for each client and work from that.
a) Determine dates for which you qualify for ERC, based on either: – the full or partial shut-down period, or – a gross receipts decline of 50% over the same quarter in 2019 (the latter qualifies you from the beginning of that quarter to the end of the quarter where receipts go back up to 80%)
Keep in mind that both scenarios may apply, but for different periods — for example, the business was shut down on 3/18/20, and then later fully reopened… and then the 50% revenue drop started in the following quarter.
Note: you may want to find out the exact dates that your client’s city/county/state decreed full-capacity indoor dining was illegal — for those dates, restaurants qualify for ERC based on “full/partial shut-down” rules. If your client is a gym, bar, or other type of non-essential business that had hours limited, find out the exact full-or-partial shut-down dates decreed for that industry in that specific area.
b) Determine PPP covered period. For most folks, this will be the 24 weeks starting on the date of loan fund disbursement.
c) Determine the “bookend” periods — the time both before and after the PPP covered period; for the timeframe when the client qualified for ERC but was not in the PPP realm.
Step Two You may be able to skip the rest of the steps by eyeballing whether you’re able to claim the entire 2020 ERC of $5k per employee (on the first 10k paid to each) all in one quarter — for most businesses this would usually be the final quarter of the year. Then, not only will you not have to worry about overlapping PPP and ERC payroll dollars, but you also will be able to claim this through most payroll companies and not have to manually amend the 4Q 2020 Form 941. Double-bonus!
If not, then see if you can get the full $5k per employee ERC (again, on the first 10k paid to each) using only the periods before and after the PPP1 covered period. You at least eliminate the need to juggle the PPP payroll dollars along with the ERC payroll dollars during the covered period.
Step Three If that’s not an option — if you can’t get to the full 10k within the bookend periods — then:
Before you work on PPP1 forgiveness, subtract whatever the 2020 unallocated ERC balance is after Step 2 (not to exceed 10k of wages per employee) from the payroll amounts during the PPP covered period — before putting numbers in the forgiveness application, just to make sure you can still get full forgiveness at this rate. This is just a “gut check” to see if you can eliminate the need to run the actual ERC calculations for the PPP covered period.
If so, then go ahead and take ERC on the difference, even if you haven’t figured out the specifics of your PPP1 forgiveness yet.
Step 4 If you can’t get full forgiveness on PPP1 at this rate, then go ahead and fill out the PPP1 application in full, using only 60% of the PPP funds to allocate payroll.
Then see how many payroll dollars are “left over” to be used for ERC.
And remember that you can use payroll from employees who made over $100k annually for ERC during the PPP period — because those dollars are not eligible for PPP (due to rules and limitations specific to that program), but they are eligible for ERC.
You can also count — for ERC purposes — dollars that were above 60% of the PPP loan, and therefore are not needed for forgiveness (presuming the business has sufficient eligible costs to make up the 40% “non-payroll” portion of PPP forgiveness).
Think of it this way: you are effectively reducing the ERC subtraction amount per-employee from PPP forgiveness until you get to full PPP forgiveness… and taking 2020 ERC on the balance (since as I mentioned before, the PPP payroll dollars are more tax-advantaged than the ERC dollars).
Does this four-step process sound easy? No! It’s not. It may not in fact be worth it for most small business clients to pay a professional to scoop up the remaining piddly amounts in the PPP covered period — in which case, consider just using Steps One and Two: the amounts in the bookend periods, or even better, just the amount from the final quarter (because that way they don’t have to pay you to manually prepare a 4Q Form 941, either).
But reviewing this approach before going in and working on all the client ERC and PPP calculations should help a great deal in identifying where the bulk of the payroll dollars are that will qualify for the ERC program, and will allow you to make intelligent decisions about which periods to mine for this type of financial relief for your small business clients.
If this or any other posts on the website were useful to you, and your financial situation permits it, please consider contributing to my tip jar. Ths allows me to continue to provide free accounting resources to small businesses who do not have the funds available to hire a CPA.
